Find the limits that can end a challenge or funded account, understand which details still need official verification and see how personal protection boundaries can help keep emotion out of the decision.
Example only. A real setup depends on the provider, programme, account size and current rules.
Hard rule values are published only after the relevant official programme source and rule version have been checked.
View methodology →Search the directory and compare firms side by side. Rules are verified per programme and account type before they are published.
8 firms listed. Official sources checked 28 Aug 2026; compare up to three or open a firm-specific rule mapping below.
1-Step and 2-Step are separated because their daily-loss and maximum-loss mechanics differ. The interactive mapping also labels qualification rules separately from breach protection.
The Trading Combine separates the hard Maximum Loss Limit from the optional Daily Loss Limit session stop. CopierPilot coverage is shown with that distinction.
Stellar 1-Step, 2-Step and Lite are kept as separate programme records so daily and maximum-loss values are never blended into one generic percentage.
High Stakes and 2-Step use different daily reference mechanics. The mapping distinguishes exact static protection from daily guards and manual news checks.
2 Step Standard and 2 Step Pro are separated. The daily rule needs the correct opening baseline, while the static maximum-loss floor maps more directly to protection.
EOD and Intraday evaluations are different products: one combines a soft daily stop with EOD trailing drawdown, while the other uses real-time trailing drawdown without a DLL.
Builder and Rapid are separated because their Daily Loss Limit and qualification rules differ. EOD maximum-loss mechanics are treated as conservative trailing guards.
E8 One and Signature use different drawdown models, and some E8 parameters can vary at checkout. The mapping therefore tells traders to use the values on their actual account.
Try another firm name or reset the current filter.
Select up to three firms. The table compares current source status and high-level loss-rule models; programme detail remains in the interactive mapping.
| Comparison field | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Profile status | |||
| Daily loss | |||
| Maximum loss | |||
| Matching policies |
The example changes by firm and programme. Each row is labelled as enforced protection, conservative guard, monitoring, manual check or not hard-protected — so the page never implies more coverage than the current engine provides.
Funding and payout terms still matter, but the first comparison layer focuses on the limits and permissions that can end or restrict an account.
Value, calculation basis, floating P&L, fees, reset time and breach effect.
Matching policiesDaily Loss Limit · Max Floating Loss Enforced when the firm formula is representableStatic, balance-based, equity-based, intraday trailing or end-of-day trailing.
Matching policiesOverall Drawdown · Live Risk Monitoring Static can match; EOD trailing is conservativeBest-day share, calculation period, reset condition and the effect on targets or payouts.
Matching toolsConsistency Calculator · Analytics Discipline Monitoring No hard Protection V2 triggerContracts, lots, open positions, scaling tiers and instrument-specific limits.
Matching policiesMax Total Lot Size · Max Lot Size per Trade · Max Open Trades Not hard-protected by Protection V2Reset timezone, news restrictions, session cutoffs, overnight and weekend rules.
Matching policiesTrading Window · Event Risk Monitoring · Alerts Manual unless separately supportedCopy trading, EAs, API or bridge conditions — always programme-specific and source-backed.
Required checkOfficial programme terms and account permissions Manual verification requiredEach completed firm profile connects verified programme rules to calculators and matching CopierPilot protection policies.
Programme-level rule tables, official sources, worked examples and visible change history.
Published per completed profileEnter the relevant account and programme values to calculate remaining rule space.
Built on verified firm dataTranslate verified rules into a personal, user-confirmed protection setup with clear coverage status.
Automated, partial or manualEvery hard value must be tied to the exact programme, phase, account variant, official source and verification date. Secondary comparison sites help identify what to research but do not replace provider sources.
Use provider rule pages, help centres, programme terms and dated announcements.
Never combine different phases, account sizes or loss models into one percentage.
Label each rule automated, partial, monitor-only, manual-check or unsupported.
Show last verification, source links and changes before a template is offered.
CopierPilot provides comparison and protection tools. The provider's current programme rules and decisions remain decisive.
No. CopierPilot can help enforce selected personal boundaries, but provider calculations, market gaps, slippage, platform interruptions and changing rules mean that a breach can never be ruled out.
Prop firm rules can differ by programme, phase and account size. CopierPilot only publishes hard rule values after the relevant official source and rule version have been checked.
No. The provider sets its official limit. A protection boundary is a stricter personal threshold selected by the trader to create room before the provider limit is reached.
Explore Account Protection now, or create a free CopierPilot workspace and build the full setup when you are ready.
